The first text I chose to look into was a journal titled "The war has turned our lives upside down" : The Merit of Commercial Advertising in Documenting the Cultural History of the British Home Front in the Second World War. The journal is focused around the idea that the striking, memorable war poster we know and associate with the second world war were not in fact the best graphic representation of life at that time. The author questions whether this recognisable and nostalgic government propaganda that is so much associated with the war time were a true visual representation of how British people acted and felt at this time and alternatively shows how commercial advertising was perhaps more relevant.
The author discusses how government propaganda was not representational of real life on the home front but rather a reflection of an almost theatrical and unfamiliar image that the people of Britain could not relate to. The author explains that commercial advertising was much more effective as it related to the people with familiar ideas and concepts that helped people adapt to the war rather than be overwhelmed by it.
Several examples of commercial advertisements are given by the author from the time that related well to the lives of people in Britain. It is reiterated throughout the article that the ads which related to everyday experiences and how to balance these with working during these hard times were most effective. An example that helped me to understand the authors point of view was the advert about " Mrs Peek's Puddings" which was promoting easy to make food - very appealing as woman had to balance working( to contribute to the war effort) as well as being a housewife, this supported the reality of people having to adapt their normal lives to the situation of war time life rather than being soupy controlled by it, people still had to get by on a day to day basis.
The views of the author are backed up by occasionally referring to secondary sources, one of which gives insight from Philip Stobo, a man who worked in advertising during the war and was part of many successful campaigns at the time. He explains that in advertising, we should look at "real living people" a point stressed by the author throughout the article about connecting and relating to your target market. It is helpful that the author makes references and includes opinions from other relevant people about the topic as it helps to back up his ideas and consolidate them.
I found it important that the author showed why government propaganda was not truly representational at the time by explaining that although visually striking the posters were generally over the top and enthusiastic, they tried to make war look appealing but it wasn't - people were depressed by the thought of war and needed advise on how to deal with it - especially in correspondence to daily life. It was also interesting to note that although commercial advertising dealt with 'the uncomfortable truths' it was effective because it was real-life and reassuring for people to know that everyone was in the same boat.
Although I do agree that government propaganda was not the the best documentation for representing the people of this era, I feel that the author could have looked into why the government used these glamourised visuals more. Although the author picks up on the fact that the propaganda 'became mythologized as a way to cope with the harsh realities of being at war' he doesn't look into maybe why they had to remain positive - could it have been because they didn't want to seem weak in the eyes of the enemy? If we take the authors line of reasoning on board, it undermines the exciting, nostalgic and memorable graphic design that we currently associate so strongly with that era. The author touched on it slightly but I feel should taken on board that these were adverts still trying to sell products, using psychology to encourage empathy in people which would cause their products to be remembered.
The overall main points that were expressed in this paper were that although government propaganda from the war time is visually exciting and well known, it is not the necessarily the best visual source we can use to learn about the time period. We can learn from commercial advertising what everyday life was like in the war and if we were to rely on government propaganda alone we would not get an accurate account of how people felt and acted, which was so important to the history of this crucial time.